Next: Non-horizontally aligned particles. Up: Geometrical Interpretation. Previous: The polarization trajectory.

## Randomly oriented particles.

In contrast with the aligned particle case, where the scattering is characterized by four quantities, the scattering from randomly oriented particles is characterized by only two quantities (Scott, 1999). These are the average scattering cross-section

 (15)

and a quantity which we term the sphericity parameter,
 g = (16)

The sphericity parameter is generally between zero and unity and is analogous to the shape correlation factor f of aligned particles. It is also a function of the f and values that the particles would have if they were aligned (see Appendix). g is unity only in the limiting case when the randomly oriented particles are spherical and decreases with increasing departures from sphericity; hence its name. g approaches zero for highly elongated particles such as chaff fibers.

Figure 7 depicts the polarization changes produced by randomly oriented particles. affects the overall strength of the backscattered signal and therefore the radius I of the total power sphere. Changes in the polarization state itself are caused only by the sphericity parameter g. When the incident polarization state is circular (or nearly circular), the only effect of random orientation is to introduce an unpolarized component into the scattered signal. By symmetry, the polarized part of the signal remains circular. Therefore only the degree of polarization of the signal is changed (arrow a in the figure). If the degree of polarization of the incident signal is , the scattered value is (Scott, 1999; Krehbiel and Scott, 1999)

 (17)

In other words, p is reduced by the quantity g/(2-g).

A similar result is obtained when the incident polarization is linear or nearly linear. The random orientation introduces an unpolarized component that reduces p (arrow b) but the polarized part remains linear and, by symmetry, oriented in the same direction. p is reduced by a lesser amount when the incident polarization is linear than when it is circular. In particular, it can be shown that

 (18)

A numerical example is helpful in understanding the above results. If g= 0.90, the degree of polarization is reduced by a factor of 0.828 for circular polarization and by a factor of 0.909 for linear polarization. The actual amount by which p is reduced is (1-0.828)=0.182 for circular polarization and (1-0.909)=0.091 for linear polarization. The reduction in p is therefore greater by a factor of two for circular polarization than for linear polarization. Thus circular polarization is a factor of two more sensitive to randomly oriented particles than linear polarization. (The relative sensitivity is more than a factor of two different for small values of g.)

When the incident polarization state is elliptical, the scattering reduces the degree of polarization by an intermediate amount and at the same time makes the polarized part of the signal more linear (arrows c). The latter results from the fact that some of the particles are aligned with the incident polarization. The differential reflectivity of these particles increases the ellipticity of the signal. The orientation of the polarization ellipse remains unchanged, however, so that the polarization state moves along a line of constant longitude toward the equator of the Poincaré sphere. Scattering from randomly oriented particles therefore enhances the ellipticity of an already elliptical signal but does not change the orientation of the ellipse. The continued effect of this is to cause the polarization state to approach linear. A perfectly circular polarization remains circular and experiences only a decrease in its degree of polarization.

The above changes are azimuthally symmetric about the vertical or circular polarization axis of the Poincaré sphere. Because of this, the changes are most simply described in a spherical coordinate system for which LHC or the Stokes parameter V is the polar axis. By convention, the polar angle of such a system is defined in terms of its complement up from the equatorial plane, . The azimuth angle is defined as . When , for example, the polarization ellipse is oriented at an angle of from the horizontal; thus corresponds to the orientation angle of the ellipse. is a measure of the ellipticity.

A quantitative description of the polarization changes is given by Scott (1999) and by Krehbiel and Scott (1999). The backscatter effects described above are accompanied by corresponding propagation effects, which will be cumulative with range. The radar signal will therefore become increasingly unpolarized in propagating through a region of randomly oriented particles, and (to a lesser extent) more linearly polarized. An example of such a propagation effect was noted in the observations of Figure 14.

The relatively large decreases of and p in the observations of the previous section, down to , could be produced by aligned particles having a shape correlation coefficient f= 0.70 or by aligned particles having a sphericity factor g= 0.82). Typical values of f for liquid drops having their equilibrium shapes have been calculated to be 0.99 (Sachidananda and Zrnic, 1985), and have been observed to be 0.98 (Balakrishnan and Zrnic, 1990a). Drop oscillations reduce this value somewhat, but low correlation and degree of polarization values are most likely an indicator of random orientation.

Next: Non-horizontally aligned particles. Up: Geometrical Interpretation. Previous: The polarization trajectory.
Bill Rison
1999-09-03